<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerShell: A Better CMD.EXE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/</link>
	<description>Occasionally Relevant Insights from a Software Builder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Cyprich</title>
		<link>http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/comment-page-1/#comment-173576</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Cyprich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/#comment-173576</guid>
		<description>PowerShell would be great to replace all of the batch files I&#039;m using on the Windows 2000 site, but I could also write simple apps in C# to do the same thing.

A great addition to PowerShell would be to have a choice to use any .NET language for scripting. I found examples in C# using Add-Type, but couldn&#039;t get them to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PowerShell would be great to replace all of the batch files I&#8217;m using on the Windows 2000 site, but I could also write simple apps in C# to do the same thing.</p>
<p>A great addition to PowerShell would be to have a choice to use any .NET language for scripting. I found examples in C# using Add-Type, but couldn&#8217;t get them to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffery Hicks</title>
		<link>http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/comment-page-1/#comment-173575</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffery Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/#comment-173575</guid>
		<description>I needed to make sure your readers didn&#039;t get the impression that Microsoft was offering them a version choice, because they really aren&#039;t. Personally, I wouldn&#039;t take the risk of run pre-pre release software in a production environment.

And unfortunately, I doubt you will ever see a version of PowerShell supported on Windows 2000, at least not from Microsoft.  The features they are adding just can&#039;t be retrofitted to Windows 2000. They have plenty of work just getting PowerShell v2 features to run on Windows XP and Windows 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I needed to make sure your readers didn&#8217;t get the impression that Microsoft was offering them a version choice, because they really aren&#8217;t. Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t take the risk of run pre-pre release software in a production environment.</p>
<p>And unfortunately, I doubt you will ever see a version of PowerShell supported on Windows 2000, at least not from Microsoft.  The features they are adding just can&#8217;t be retrofitted to Windows 2000. They have plenty of work just getting PowerShell v2 features to run on Windows XP and Windows 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Cyprich</title>
		<link>http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/comment-page-1/#comment-173573</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Cyprich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/#comment-173573</guid>
		<description>Jeffery, I learned PowerShell with v1.0 but I decided to use 2.0 for the extra functionality it provided. While its not meant for use in a production environment, I&#039;m using it in one with caution.

I hope that Microsoft will create a version of PowerShell that runs in Windows 2000 since I&#039;m administering one server which could use the better scripting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffery, I learned PowerShell with v1.0 but I decided to use 2.0 for the extra functionality it provided. While its not meant for use in a production environment, I&#8217;m using it in one with caution.</p>
<p>I hope that Microsoft will create a version of PowerShell that runs in Windows 2000 since I&#8217;m administering one server which could use the better scripting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Cyprich</title>
		<link>http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/comment-page-1/#comment-173569</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Cyprich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/#comment-173569</guid>
		<description>PowerShell would make Windows more appealing to UNIX systems administrators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PowerShell would make Windows more appealing to UNIX systems administrators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anupam Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/comment-page-1/#comment-173565</link>
		<dc:creator>Anupam Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/#comment-173565</guid>
		<description>I downloaded and installed Microsoft’s PowerShell. I found it quit intreasting and useful. It gives a UNIX flavour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded and installed Microsoft’s PowerShell. I found it quit intreasting and useful. It gives a UNIX flavour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffery Hicks</title>
		<link>http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/comment-page-1/#comment-173562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffery Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyprich.com/2009/02/03/powershell-a-better-cmdexe/#comment-173562</guid>
		<description>While PowerShell v2.0 has a wealth of new features it is NOT supported in a production environment. Technically it is not even an alpha product yet and things can change.  You won&#039;t waste any time learning PowerShell v1.0 as basic concepts and core cmdlets don&#039;t really change. PowerShell v2.0 simply adds a lot of new stuff to the mix.

Jeffery Hicks
Microsoft PowerShell MVP
http://blog.sapien.com
follow me: http://www.twitter.com/JeffHicks

&quot;Those who forget to script are doomed to repeat their work.&quot;

Now Available: Managing Active Directory With Windows PowerShell: TFM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While PowerShell v2.0 has a wealth of new features it is NOT supported in a production environment. Technically it is not even an alpha product yet and things can change.  You won&#8217;t waste any time learning PowerShell v1.0 as basic concepts and core cmdlets don&#8217;t really change. PowerShell v2.0 simply adds a lot of new stuff to the mix.</p>
<p>Jeffery Hicks<br />
Microsoft PowerShell MVP<br />
<a href="http://blog.sapien.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sapien.com</a><br />
follow me: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/JeffHicks" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/JeffHicks</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Those who forget to script are doomed to repeat their work.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now Available: Managing Active Directory With Windows PowerShell: TFM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

